Trial by television of "fear itself"...There’s no denying the timeliness of a film that takes as its main theme the principle that a person should not be judged guilty without evidence being assessed and tested in an open court of law.
When a country is allowed to be railroaded into a course of action in which hearsay, bad intelligence and innuendo form the backbone of its policies, then it has truly lost its spine. Though Good Night, and Good Luck relates to a specific period in America’s political life where this was a very real danger, its contemporary resonance is obvious.
Beautifully realised in stunning black and white, director George Clooney’s staging of journalist Ed Murrow’s stand against the anti-communist Senator, Joe McCarthy, is full of period detail set in the claustrophobic television studio and production offices of CBS's See It Now programme.
Though this may be due to budgetary restrictions, the lack of exterior shots reinforces the subterranean existence of TV producer Fred Friendly (played by Clooney) and the staff that serviced the show to great effect.
On the rare occasions the movie does leave the studio, it is to an early hours bar room where the team anxiously pour over first editions, or the glacial corridors of the senate hearings and the plusher skyscraper rat-runs of corporate America.
Here CBS boss William Paley (superbly played by frank Langella as corpulent fire-breathing dragon with a conscience) frets about ratings and sponsors, but ultimately backs Friendly and Murrow in their work as they go head to head with McCarthy.
The real heart of the movie is in Murrow’s own words and in actor David Strathairn, Clooney has found a perfect medium through which those stirring speeches to camera are channelled.
The lucidity of Murrow’s actual text needs no canny polishing from screenwriters to make it both exciting and eerily current. As civil liberties continue to be eroded in the political fall-out following 9/11, Murrow’s counsel that “we cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home” remains as startlingly relevant in 2006 as it did in 1954.
The film is framed by Murrow’s address to the Radio-Television News Directors Association & Foundation in 1958. At a time when the media appear increasingly timid and transfixed by the politician's spinning of the news agenda, Murrow’s plea for television to aspire to be something more than the delivery mechanism of eye and brain candy appears positively revolutionary.
“This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and it can even inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is merely wires and lights in a box. There is a great and perhaps decisive battle to be fought against ignorance, intolerance and indifference. This weapon of television could be useful. Stonewall Jackson, who knew something about the use of weapons, is reported to have said, "When war comes, you must draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." The trouble with television is that it is rusting in the scabbard during a battle for survival.”
Though modern day journalists such as John Pilger on the left, and his right-wing counterpart, Peter Hitchens can be just as elequent and passionate in their command of language and arguement, it's impossible to imagine the kind of insight and intellect which Murrow encapsulates being allowed to flourish on prime-time today.
So whilst the movie is a call to intellectual arms, it is also an elegy to integrity, truth and lost potential. Though these characters win the battle, it seems as though we've all but lost the war.
Yet for all the worth and merit articulated throughout the film there were times when the tension inexplicably slackened.
Narrative hotspots such as the harrying of newscaster Don Hollenbeck by the right-wing Hearst press (which may or may not have been a contributing factor to his suicide at the time) were side-stepped in favour of a subplot about CBS’s policy of not hiring married couples.
More serious than this though was that whilst Murrow was seen to be a tangible presence (you almost had a sore throat and itching eyes from his continual cigarette smoke) McCarthy seemed relagated to be something of a distant bogeyman, seen and heard only in actual news footage rather than given physicality by an actor equal to Strathairn's remarkable portrayal.
There’s another story going on out there somewhere but we don’t get to see it and at times it feels like a bit of one-sided contest.
Whilst laudably mirroring See It Now’s handling of the original topic (using McCarthy’s own anti-Red rhetoric against him), the tension and heat generated by the cast felt somewhat dissipated by the documentary ambience whenever we switched from actors to real life.
Though Murrow’s camp was brilliantly brought to life, the office of the Senator from Wisconsin remained emotionally distant and out of view, reduced to a flickering bit part on a TV screen in the corner of an office.
Just as Murrow believed his position was correct, McCarthy must also have felt himself to be acting in the best interests of his country. Yet nothing of his motives are explored or discussed through the kind of exemplary characterisation afforded to Murrow. When McCarthy’s fall from grace comes, the personal crisis brought about as a result of having played fast and loose with the truth is unseen.
Perhaps Clooney wanted to avoid being too triumphant about the bad guy getting his comeuppance but he ends up robbing the movie of a dramatic payoff, short changing what could have been a truly great film. Notwithstanding these points, Clooney deserves our praise for bringing this episode to the screen.