I’ve just finished reading a couple of ripping yarns that were part of Joseph’s Christmas box. Both happen to be set in London; one far away in the future and the other in an alternative time that has the characteristics of the present day but feels ancient. Come to think of whenever I go to London it always has that aura about it. The writer and ace-compiler of psychogeography,
Iain Sinclair sees our capital city as a grid where past and present constantly connect with one another, forever hauling the population into lines that were fixed into earth when the Romans were just a faraway bunch of uppity foreigners, a mere footnote in the Druid's Rough Guide to the (then) known world.
Though rarely realised, our modern buildings often follow the routes of forgotten rivers, reed-thin alleyways snake between towering office blocks, conduits through which the past still courses. Despite an impressive procession of fires, floods, planning committees and the tactical assistance of the Luftwaffe, such tiny passageways and cuts have been in place for centuries.
Anyone who saw Peter Akroyd’s fascinating overview of
London (much less his breathtaking autobiography of the city) will be amazed by how well these routes retain their integrity. They persevere against the odds; antiquated David’s against the modern-day Goliaths that loom over them.

Whether or not they endure in the post-apocalyptic far-flung future of Philip Reeves’
Mortal Engines isn’t entirely clear. Here, London, literally and metaphorically, struggles to keep ahead of the urban sprawl by slowly trundling along on enormous wheels.
This unwieldy behemoth ravenously searches for prey – other similarly mobile towns and cities fated to provide London with the necessary resources to keep moving. It’s the survival of the fittest, a time where a brutal Municipal Darwinism (as Reeve describes it) determines the outcome of great lumbering battles in which they face up to each other like a couple of vast pirate galleons.
With an intensely visual writing style, Reeve cleanly and simply plots the course of the principal characters as they learn that all is not what it seems and begin questioning the wisdom and honesty of those in authority. A corrupt ruling class sit atop of an ordered society where the proles do what they’ve always done; provide the sweat and muscle whilst those above enjoy the high life. In the emotional crucible that follows morality becomes something of a moveable feast as Tom and Hester learn fast about loss, betrayal and revenge.
Reminiscent in places of Fritz Lang’s visionary Metropolis, our heroes realise that for good to prevail they must sacrifice and abandon everything they’ve ever held dear. The ecological and social parables that are contained Mortal Engines are there to be gently turned over by the inquisitive child rather than emblazoned and obvious.
A taut episodic narrative is maintained throughout and whilst the time-honoured convention concerning heroes and outcomes are observed, Reeve avoids sugaring the pill too much. If Terry Gilliam were ever short of a movie to make then this book would be it.
With
The Amulet of Samarkand (Part one of the Bartimaeus trilogy) Jonathan Stroud offers a London of the not-quite-now (or then). It’s a dark place, coated in a murky Victorian veneer populated by arrogant and domineering magicians and lowly humans who know their place. As with Mortal Engines, it’s the political classes who are the villains of the piece, their avarice and vanity having disastrous consequences on the rest of us hapless chumps not gifted in the ways of magic.
When apprentice wizard Nathaniel summons the wily djinn, Bartimaeus, to do his dodgy bidding their fates become inextricably linked. A well-crafted mutual dislike inflames an already fiery situation, creating a memorable double act reluctantly though pragmatically battling together, as they attempt to outwit all kinds of malice and magical malpractice.
Now you might think there wouldn’t be much life left in the twelve year old schoolboy-magician franchise. Certainly Stroud might well be invoking unwanted comparisons with you-know-who. However, whilst appreciating and greatly approving of JK Rowling’s conjuring trick in making reading seem as sexy as rock n’ roll to legions of kids around the globe, I’ve never found the Potter chronicles particularly convincing.
Stroud’s convincing and vivid characterisation means that Nathaniel comes across as petulant, arrogant, disagreeable and vindictive; in short much like a real twelve year old lad and not some cut-out-and-keep maquette.
Unravelling plots within plots, Nathaniel comes to understand that subterfuge and deception are the real low-magic tools utilised by the privileged elite to keep the populace politically supine.

The real triumph of Stroud’s writing lies in Bartimaeus’ acidic observations of the whole sorry human condition and in making us care about a kid who viewed one way, had it coming. The djinn’s world-weary, seen it all before account of his unwanted servitude to Nathaniel is wonderfully entertaining from the very first to the last.
They say a good yarn depends on the hero being transformed by the journey he or she has embarked on. But as Bartimaeus observes, at the end of this rite of passage, sometimes that change isn’t always for the best. We grow and get toughened up but in doing so something of us is diminished or lost. In a lesser writer issues of compromise and incorporation would be botched but The Amulet of Samarkand graphically shows that power really does corrupt.